โ† All manuscripts

Proof review

Henry Zweiman. September 16, 2026.

This review was performed by the originating assistant. It is not independent human verification or a formal proof certificate.

The complete consolidated manuscript was reread, including its weak-curvature hypotheses and the passages to singular limits. No fatal gap was found in this pass. The following checks identify the actual proof obligations rather than treating numerical agreement as proof.

The dimension restriction is substantive: the endpoint slope and the displayed lune energy lower bound used here do not give the same argument in dimension two. The perimeter interval is dimensional but nonexplicit. The full spherical fixed-perimeter conjecture is not solved.

Artifact review

The publication copy has complete Markdown, portable LaTeX, and a 17-page PDF. All exact final pages were rendered and visually inspected after the bibliography and equation numbering were corrected. There is no clipping, overlapping text, or missing rendered mathematical glyph in the inspected copy. The main theorem statement is kept together. Text extraction, equation-reference checks and the 462-expression Markdown check supplement this visual inspection. These are artifact checks, not mathematical certification.

The three diagnostic scripts check algebra and finite examples. The manuscript's universal conclusions rest on the hand proofs. The paper does not compute the actual first eigenvalue of a lune numerically.